Image courtesy of www.theage.com.au
If you watched yesterday’s Grand Prix held in Sepang, Malaysia, you would have known why Mark Webber (right) looked pretty peeved off.
Even if you’re not an F1 fan (that’s okay, I forgive you), it doesn’t matter… yesterday’s race was extremely dramatic and emotionally charged. I’m guessing lots of people especially commentators would be discussing this race for some time to come- okay maybe until the next one which is held in China.
Basically the results were this:
#1 Sebastian Vettel- finished first. He got there ONLY because he defied team orders where they said to the two drivers (Sebastian and Mark are from the same team) that they had to keep their current formation. At the time, Mark Webber was leading the race and had done so for quite some time. The team orders was to “slow” down the cars and keep driving to the finish line with Webber in front, Sebastian coming second.
Mr. Vettel decided- stuff that. This is the guy who’s very USED to winning and always obviously coming first. So in a very spectacle order, he, who almost wiped out both himself and his team mate decided to take matters into his own hands and over took his “slower” team mate just so that he could come first.
He apologised to the angry team mate. It still doesn’t cut it in my opinion.
#2 Mark Webber- he was so ANGRY at his team mate that he clearly didn’t want anything to do with him. We watched on LIVE tv the exchange between where he was repeating a coded message to Vettel.
Here’s the thing- Mark will always be the #2 driver for Red Bull. I think he knows this, even though Vettel is an arrogant young annoying brat, the truth of the matter is he wins races. So even with stupid antics like this, most of it will go unnoticed. It’s only the media/social media that’s having a sh1t storm about it.
The other thing is, Mark’s no saint, he’s defied team orders once before just so he could win. But I guess when it’s you that’s on the losing end of the schtick, nobody likes it much.
Also, a lot of people assume that this year could be Webber’s last year, and if it is (which I don’t think it is), seriously stuff team orders, when Vettel did the dirty move and over took Webber, I would have wiped him out and crashed into him. That would teach Vettel a lesson or two…. and it would be VERY satisfying job to do also (dangerous too)
#3 Lewis Hamilton- He looked uncomfortable as hell standing on that podium. And it wasn’t because of the conflict between the #1 and #2 drivers. No, basically he KNEW he shouldn’t have been there to begin with. He robbed his team mate (who came 4th) of being number 3. Clearly his team mate had the better and faster car. But somehow Mercedes Petronas stuffed up with their calculations and left Lewis with limited fuel. He was driving so slow where it got to the point of his team mate Nico Rosberg communicating back to the team with “Hey, I need to over take, Hamilton is just too slow” and the team manager barking orders with “No, you stay where you are”. And Rosberg, unlike Vettel didn’t defy orders and stayed behind a slow car in front of him.
Then there’s the interesting discussion on whether or not team management should be dictating how the drivers race. Because clearly the team’s did or in RedBull’s case tried to. Either way, no matter what the team “decision” is, everyone is a loser. They’re a loser for listening- in the case of Webber and Nico Rosberg (he lost big time man). and if Vettel didn’t defy the orders, he would have been a loser because clearly coming second wouldn’t cut it. Hamilton was a loser because winning his podium spot when he knew he clearly didn’t deserve it made him feel teribble.
The viewers/fans are the biggest losers because we clearly get an orchestrated podium finish which isn’t really satisfying- except when the drivers throw a dummy spit(which they all did) and it makes it fascinating to watch.
Of course the easy solution would be that “management” should butt out and let the drivers do what they do best, drive the cars. And let the chips fall where they fall.